The $1.5 Million Hidden in Denton ISD’s Master Schedule
- Jeremy Earnhart
- Aug 1
- 6 min read
Updated: 22 hours ago
What The Cost of Not Playing Looks Like at District Scale
What if one of Denton ISD’s most significant staffing opportunities is already sitting inside the master schedule?
The answer may have less to do with cutting programs than with increasing participation.
A structural modeling exercise suggests that relatively modest growth in band, choir, and orchestra participation across Denton ISD’s four comprehensive high schools could reduce long-term staffing pressure by approximately:
20 teaching positions — roughly $1.5 million annually.
This is not a claim about current Denton ISD staffing decisions, nor is it a recommendation to eliminate 20 existing positions.
It is an illustration of something much larger:
Participation is a staffing strategy.
Or, more directly:
Enrollment design is staffing policy.
And the process begins years before students reach high school.
The Denton ISD Model
Consider a participation increase at each of Denton ISD’s four comprehensive high schools of:
+100 band students
+50 choir students
+50 orchestra students
That represents 200 additional students participating in large-ensemble music at each campus.
Why does that matter financially?
Because those students are already in the school system AND there is the existing capacity.
The question is not whether the district will educate them. The question is where they appear in the master schedule — and how many sections and teachers are required to serve them.
The Core Economic Principle
Traditional thinking often treats music programs primarily as an expense.
But large-ensemble music has an unusual structural characteristic:
As participation increases, these programs can absorb additional students efficiently within the master schedule.
When students do not participate in band, choir, or orchestra, they do not disappear from the schedule. They must enroll somewhere else.
Depending upon grade level and local requirements, that can mean additional demand for:
non-music fine arts sections;
physical education sections; and
other elective sections throughout the secondary schedule.
Those costs are predictable, recurring, and embedded in the staffing structure of a school.
Large ensembles work differently.
A band, choir, or orchestra section can often accommodate enrollment growth without requiring another teacher every time another 20–30 students enter the program.
That creates something school finance conversations rarely recognize:
Participation Density.
When more students can be served effectively within scalable sections, staffing demand elsewhere in the master schedule can decline.
Denton ISD Application — Per High School
Using the structural assumptions developed in The Cost of Not Playing, consider what happens when 200 additional students participate in music at one comprehensive high school.
Band: +100 Students
The modeled impact includes reduced staffing pressure associated with:
non-music fine arts — approximately 1 FTE
physical education — approximately 1 FTE
downstream electives in grades 10–12 — approximately 1 FTE
Modeled impact: approximately 3 FTE, or $225,000 annually.
Choir + Orchestra: +100 Students Combined
The modeled impact includes reduced staffing pressure associated with:
non-music fine arts — approximately 1 FTE
downstream electives in grades 10–12 — approximately 1 FTE
Modeled impact: approximately 2 FTE, or $150,000 annually.
Total Per Campus
Together, the model produces approximately:
5 FTE — or $375,000 in annual staffing capacity per high school.
Across four comprehensive high schools:
20 FTE — approximately $1.5 million annually.
Again, these figures represent modeled staffing capacity, not proposed personnel reductions.
The significance is the structural relationship itself.
Demonstrated results from intentional district-level program design—expanding student access while improving resource efficiency in Arlington ISD and Irving ISD.
This Is Not About Cutting Teachers
That distinction matters.
Finding 20 FTE of potential staffing capacity does not mean a district should eliminate 20 teachers.
It means district leaders potentially have 20 FTE worth of flexibility that can be deployed differently over time.
That capacity could be realized through attrition, enrollment growth, reassignment, reduced future hiring, or reinvestment into areas of greater instructional need.
The goal is not fewer opportunities for students.
It is precisely the opposite:
More student participation can create greater operational flexibility.
That is the paradox at the center of The Cost of Not Playing.
The Sixth-Grade Pipeline
The high-school calculation, however, is only the visible end of the system.
These economics begin much earlier.
The most important participation decision may occur when students first enter the secondary music pipeline.
Sixth grade — or whatever grade represents the first year of comprehensive instrumental and choral instruction in a district — establishes the participation base that eventually reaches high school.
When students are distributed across many competing elective entry points early in the secondary experience:
enrollment fragments;
participation density declines;
retention becomes more difficult;
programs become less stable; and
downstream staffing pressure increases.
When more students enter sustainable music pathways:
enrollment consolidates;
participation can grow;
retention strengthens;
large ensembles become increasingly efficient; and
staffing demand elsewhere in the schedule can stabilize.
That produces a much longer causal chain than simply “more students in band.”
Point of entry → participation → retention → high-school enrollment → master-schedule efficiency → staffing capacity.
A decision made before middle school begins can influence the staffing realities of that cohort for seven years.
The Structural Tension
School systems understandably want to provide students with more choices. But there is an unintended consequence when a relatively fixed student population is distributed across an ever-growing number of low-enrollment entry points.
More course offerings do not automatically produce more opportunity.
Sometimes they produce fragmentation.
Twenty-five students distributed among several small electives require very different staffing resources than those same students participating within scalable ensemble structures.
The question, therefore, is not simply:
How many courses do we offer?
A better systems question is:
How many students are meaningfully participating long term — and what does that participation do to the rest of the master schedule?
Why This Matters Now
Denton ISD, like school districts across Texas, must continually balance instructional priorities, staffing, compensation, enrollment, and responsible stewardship of public resources.
The district’s newly adopted 2026–27 budget reinforces how central personnel decisions are to that equation.
But efficiency does not have to mean cutting programs.
Sometimes the most powerful efficiency strategy is increasing participation in programs that already scale well.
Band, choir, and orchestra are unusual in that regard.
They provide students with belonging, identity, discipline, artistic development, and sustained connection to school while simultaneously functioning as highly scalable components of the secondary master schedule.
That combination should matter to more than music educators.
It should matter to principals.
It should matter to superintendents.
And it should matter to CFOs.
The Bigger Insight
For decades, the question surrounding school music has often been:
How much does the music program cost?
That may be the wrong question.
The more revealing question is:
What does the school system cost when students do not participate?
Because students who do not participate still occupy a seat somewhere.
They still require instruction.
They still generate staffing demand.
And the master schedule still has to accommodate them.
Once participation is viewed through that lens, band, choir, and orchestra look different.
They are not simply programs sitting on the expenditure side of a budget.
They are part of the district’s educational infrastructure.
Bottom Line
The Denton ISD model suggests that increasing music participation by approximately 200 students at each comprehensive high school could represent roughly:
20 FTE of long-term staffing capacity — approximately $1.5 million annually.
The exact number will always depend upon schedules, enrollment patterns, class-size assumptions, staffing decisions, and local circumstances.
But the larger structural principle remains:
Participation is a staffing strategy.
Enrollment design is staffing policy.
And perhaps most importantly:
The staffing decisions visible in high school may actually begin with the participation opportunities students receive years earlier.
The savings may already be hidden in plain sight.
The question is whether we design the system to find them.
∗ ∗ ∗
Jeremy L. Earnhart, Ed.D.
Founder & Principal
School Music & Fine Arts, LLC
Former President & CEO, Music for All
Former Director of Fine Arts, Arlington ISD & Irving ISD
Research at the intersection of educational strategy, organizational design, and school finance. Helping school leaders uncover hidden capacity, strengthen student opportunity, and improve organizational performance through strategic fine arts design.
His work has been covered by The New York Times, NPR/KERA, Marketplace, CBS 11, NBC 5, and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. The New York Times highlighted Arlington ISD's decision to eliminate instrument rental fees, noting that band participation at the middle and high school levels "jumped" (Rich, 2015).
That work continues in The Cost of Not Playing (2026), Dr. Earnhart’s ongoing research on the systems-level impact of music participation in public schools.
His doctoral research centered around the competencies of the central office music administrator:
Earnhart, J. L. (2017). Competencies of the public school music administrator: Texas music administrator perspectives. Journal for K-12 Educational Leadership, 1(1), 55–63.
Comments